What are the different types of gaps that could be found in the literature for my PhD Research?


  1. Research gap is a question which has not been answered relevant in a given field of study.
  2. Identifying a Research Gap is the process of comparing documented results of specific research or process against some external criteria to improve the area.
  3. Identifying a Gap in the Literature Review can help new researchers to reveal the areas of improvement and help to bridge the gap between actual and expected outcome.

PhD Literature Review Gap Identification can help researchers to identify particular areas for improvement and provide guidance to take a practical move for improving processes, material, method, or anything related to the research.

The need for identifying the research gap:

After the completion of your Research work, and you are ready to publish it online to make readers benefit from that research. And at this time, you came to know that another article posted something similar to your study and you come to know that it isn’t a novel idea. Therefore, it is necessary to make sure the Literature Gap and Future Research you address in the PhD Research is Novel new work, and that also makes the research field better. Framework for identifying research gaps which is unique to carry out that is simple at the same time provide you with novel research.

Approach to identify the research gap

Performance gap analysis:

It is the practical approach to identify the gap in research by ensuring the completed task in the study and analysing the task that needs to reach remaining goals. For Literature Review Identifying a Gap, the process helps find the gaps by comparing the variance of the research. It also allows the researchers to have a future prediction of the study and make the decision accordingly.

Profit gap analysis:

This approach helps to identify gap to understand what went wrong in the research. It might be related to either planning or execution. It helps in identifying a Gap in PhD Literature in planning or execution of research related mistakes. Performing a profit gap analysis can help to understand the situation, and the best course of action to ensure to overcome the same error.

Systematic review gap analysis:

These are helpful to delve deep into the literature and examine the trends and changes in a discipline of the research or specific study area which provides a summary of the study. It is a beneficial process when it comes to identifying a research gap in the previous study.

Analysing key findings:

This approach helps you to visit the critical concept of the articles found. It helps to find the central idea of the research that choose. Key Concepts are usually concise articles, and each one is dedicated to one specific topic. The well-known scholarly articles are selected to carry out this identification process.

The gap identification is the missing piece or pieces in the research literature. It is the area that has not explored. Gap Identification Literature Review help offers different approaches to provide you with unique answers to your Research question.

Consider the problems and the weakness of the article you selected to identify the gaps and discuss it with the experts to generate new ideas for the research. Experts in the field will help you to determine the study area and even help you correct the mistakes in your approach. If you think of a question that would be interesting to work on, you can discuss it with our experts and get their suggestions and make changes to improve every bit of the PhD Literature Gap and Future Research.


  • Kwan, B. S. (2006). The structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for specific purposes, 25(1), 30-55.
  • Bambale, A. (2014). Facilitating the PhD research process: Guides for identifying the research problem and establishing a research gap’. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4(1), 116-124.
  • Kong, H. H., & Segre, J. A. (2010). Bridging the translational research gap: a successful partnership involving a physician and a basic scientist—the Journal of investigative dermatology, 130(6), 1478.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *