Global Governance and Legal Accountability Dissertation Titles
  • / Title

Global Governance and Legal Accountability Dissertation Titles

Info: 1557 words(1 pages) Global Governance & Legal Accountability Dissertation Titles
Published: 26th November 2025 in Global Governance & Legal Accountability Dissertation Titles

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Linkedin

Related Services

Our academic writing and marking services can help you!

Introduction

The dissertation titles listed in this collection give an overview of the most serious global concerns in the implementation of human rights; among the issues are the non-compliance with international rulings, inconsistent following of the recommendations, and interference by the superpowers, besides the inefficiency of the regional human rights organisations. In addition, the topics concern the systemic barriers faced by the poor and assess how the legal and economic systems strengthen the small number of powerful companies, ultimately causing the degradation of the entire system. All these titles point to the multifaceted legal, political, and institutional reasons that are encountered on the way to accountability and the safeguarding of human rights, thus providing the opportunity for further investigation and revolutionary change.

Global Governance and Legal Accountability Dissertation Titles

1. Reinforcing International Enforcement Power: A Critical Analysis of Compliance Failure in Human Rights Judgments

The compliance of states with human rights decisions made by different bodies, among them the ECHR, is still very low and other things. The widespread violations in China, Myanmar, Syria, and Russia indicate that weak enforcement has a limit and that accountability is very hard to achieve. This investigation aims to make it clearer the understanding of the reasons for the insufficient human rights enforcement power.

Problem Statement:

The international mechanisms that are supported by little or no authority result in a low rate of compliance worldwide.

Research Question:
 What reforms in the institutions can make the international human rights bodies’ enforcement power even stronger?

Outcome:
The creation of a framework with legal authority, monitoring strength, and compliance rates reform as its main focus for the enhancement.

Reference:

Antai, G. O., Mulegi, T., Barongo, E. K., Ekpenisi, C., Kisubi, E. C., & Okonji, I. C. (2024). Exploring mechanisms for enforcing human rights within the context of international law: Issues and challenges. NIU Journal of Legal Studies, 10(1), 59-70.

2. Selective Compliance and Political Resistance: Understanding Why States Ignore Human Rights Recommendations

The states of Myanmar, Egypt, and the Philippines, among others, usually pick and choose the human rights recommendations they want to follow. The main reasons behind these choices are political interests, claims of sovereignty, and strategic motives. This paper plays the role of an investigator implicating the factors that are responsible for such partial compliance.

Problem Statement:
The international human rights recommendations are not fully followed by the states, and this leads to a weakening of the global protection system.

Research Question:
What are the political and strategic factors that influence selective state compliance with human rights norms?

Outcome:
A model that not only reveals the selective compliance drivers but also provides strategies for adherence improvement.

Reference:

Anaya-Muñoz, A. (2025). Willingness, capacities and (non) compliance with human rights norms. The International Journal of Human Rights, 29(6), 965-984.

3. Taxonomic and Sampling Biases in Tropical Pollination Studies: Consequences for Conservation and Ecological Interpretation

The African Commission, as one of the regional bodies, is faced with chronic underfunding, insufficient personnel, and difficult logistics. Thus, it is practically impossible for them to conduct an inquiry into human rights violations in countries such as the DRC and Zimbabwe. This research will analyse the manner in which capacity gaps lead to weaker protection efforts.

Problem Statement:
The lack of resources is the major reason for the failure of regional human rights organisations to monitor and enforce rights.

Research Question:
What is the effect of the funding and capacity limitations on the performance of the regional human rights bodies?

Outcome:
Proposals for improved funding mechanisms, collaboration, and institutional gaps.

Reference:

Borja-Vega, C., Grabinsky, J., & Kløve, E. (2022). Introducing a framework for analyzing weaknesses in institutional service delivery and the human rights to water and sanitation: case studies from the democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Mozambique, and Niger. Water, 14(20), 3209.

4. Barriers to Access and Participation: Examining How Marginalised Groups Are Excluded from Human Rights Mechanisms

Overcoming legal hardships and fear is the norm for women, minorities, and political opposers in countries like Saudi Arabia and Belarus, just to name a few. These hardships practically eliminate their access to human rights systems. The present article is focused on the investigation of the reason behind this exclusion.

Problem Statement:
The marginalised groups are facing systemic barriers that are denying them the opportunity to enjoy the protection of human rights mechanisms.

Research Question:
What are the legal, political, and cultural barriers that characterise the restricted human rights access of vulnerable groups to rights protection?

Outcome:
An inclusive participation framework, legal reforms, and protection measures are laid down.

Reference:

Merry, S. E. (2024). Human rights & gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.

5. Political Interference in International Human Rights Governance: The Impact of Great-Power Influence on Accountability

Besides others, China and Russia are the most powerful countries that use their political power in the UN Security Council and related organisations to block resolutions and inquiries. Such moves have a serious impact on worldwide accountability, and hence the article treats how world power politics influence enforcement.

Problem Statement:
Political interference is a major factor that hampers the accountability mechanisms of international human rights governance.

Research Question:
What is the extent to which the great powers’ influence is reflected in the enforcement of international human rights norms?

Outcome:
The establishment of reforms in governance will not only reduce the political blockage but also enhance the independence of institutions.

Reference:

Pegram, T. (2015). Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 595-620.

6. Rethinking Governance Gaps: Examining How Law Actively Constructs Corporate Power

The root cause of corporate abuses is the presence of “governance gaps”, but there is a rising body of literature that argues that the global legal systems are the ones that create corporate power instead of just not regulating it. The present study illustrates the manner in which international corporate governance laws, property rights, and corporate law generate the conditions for the occurrence of corporate human rights violations.

Problem Statement:
Discussions in the current BHR field incorrectly portray corporate power as an absence of regulation rather than a result of legal design.

Research Question:
What is the role of both national and international law in the structural production and reinforcement of corporate power that leads to human rights abuses?

Outcome:
A framework that is totally shifting the discourse around corporate abuses as a legally enabled phenomenon is being developed, which will, along with reforms be address the structural sources of power.

Reference:

Schneiderman, D. (2008). Constitutionalising Economic Globalisation: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise. Cambridge University Press.

7. Limits of Human Rights Due Diligence: When Procedural Compliance Masks Structural Harm

The main treatment for corporate-related human rights violations is the human rights due diligence process, which is seen as the only remedy. Nevertheless, critics argue that it often allows corporations to exert power over the issue, thus missing the deeper exploitation problems that are the result of market forces and legal entitlements.

Problem Statement:
The transmission of Islamic economic thought history concepts to the European scholastic mind is still a matter of scarce literature and low recognition.

Research Question:
Is HRDD a tool that standardises the questioning of the human rights violations’ institutional settings, or is it merely copying them?

Outcome:
The exploration of the structural limits of HRDD will lead to the reconfiguration of the economy and legal systems at their very foundations.

Reference:

Mares, R. (2018). Human rights due diligence and the root causes of harm in business operation. Ne. UL Rev., 10, 1.

8. State Power and Corporate Impunity: Understanding How Public Authority Legally Enables Private Harm

Governance-gap narratives are based on the assumption of states lacking capacity, whereas LPE legal research has shown that states grant corporate rights through property rights, limited liability, investment protections and labour deregulation. These arrangements, to a large extent, minimise the accountability of corporations.

Problem Statement:
Corporate impunity is not a result of state weakness but rather a product of state-created legal entitlements that are purposely designed.

Research Question:
In what way do the legal structures produced by the state generate the conditions for the occurrence of systematic business-related human rights abuses?

Outcome:
A model depicting the state as an accomplice in the formation of corporate power, leading to a policy reorientation that changes the state–market relationship.

Reference:

Alter, K. J. (2022). How Corporations Gained Impunity under International Law. Forthcoming in the American Journal of International Law, iCourts Working Paper Series, (313), 23-03.

9. Law, Social Relations of Production, and Corporate Harm: Identifying Deeper Root Causes

Current business and human rights frameworks usually link the exploitation of workers to the availability of weak enforcement or the presence of bad corporate practices, but seldom consider how global production systems, and the laws that constitute them, structurally mandate the exploitation of labour, resulting in deeper forms of structural harm.

Problem Statement:
Contemporary scholars perceive the issue merely through the lens of ‘surface-level’ legal failures, and consequently, they ignore the production relations that lie at the heart of human rights violations.

Research Question:
Which deeper social and economic relations of production underpin the legal frameworks that allow for corporate-related harm?

Outcome:
A model identifying root causes through the integration of law, political economy, and production relations that will lead to the development of more transformative interventions.

Reference:

Kaplinsky, R. (2013). Global Value Chains: Where They Come from, Where They are Going and Why This is Important. Innovation, Knowledge, Development Working Papers, 68, 1-28.

10. Internal vs Immanent Critique in BHR: Towards Transformative, Non-Reformist Approaches

BHR Critique from the radical side of academia wants a complete overhaul of the production relations; meanwhile, BHR reforms keep on relying only on institutional changes (internal critique). The current theme depicts an intersection of these two seemingly contradictory approaches.

Problem Statement:
BHR reforms are caught in the institutional framework, neglecting the social change from the bottom that is necessary to overcome structural harm.

Research Question:
Is it possible to merge the legal/institutional internal critique with the social/production-oriented immanent critique and thus derive non-reformist reforms in BHR?

Outcome:
The model being devised will be a mixed one that reveals the ways through which legal reforms and social movements can empower global production democratically and at the same time, diminish structural harm.

Reference:

Kampourakis, I., & Lane, L. (2025). The Law and Political Economy of Business and Human Rights: From governance gaps to root causes. Leiden Journal of International Law, 1-16.

Need assistance finalising your dissertation topic? Selecting a strong, researchable topic can be challenging — but you don’t have to do it alone. Our research consultants can help refine your ideas, identify literature gaps, and guide you toward a topic that aligns with current academic trends and your programme requirements. Contact us to begin one-on-one topic development and refinement with PhdAssistance.com Research Lab.

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Linkedin

Cite this work

Study Resources

Free resources to assist you with your university studies!

This will close in 0 seconds