Guide to an engineering Ph.D. literature review
Contemplating a literature review? Remember these sage tips from Ph.D. dissertation help guides.
As you write the Ph.D. engineering literature review, ensure you follow these tips to showcase your ideas (Jensen):
- Compare and contrast views of different authors;
- critique previous research work;
- reveal lapses in existing research;
- shed light on how your work relates to previous work;
- state problems, conflicts, debates, gaps;
- define a research area in a new way; and,
- probe previous work’s results.
You must structure your lit review. Yes, these are the 2 ways you can arrange your Ph.D. literature review. A chronological structure lists the order of publication; thematic structure clubs sources based on the following criteria: concepts, topics, and concepts. Because these criteria are important to the author’s research.
Sections in literature review
Include the following in your writing:
- Summarize the subject, issue, or theory under consideration;
- categorize sources to support or contradict a position;
- present connections between the sources;
- draw conclusions on significant contributions; and,
- develop of your subject.
So a lit review is an overarching study. A scientific and academic writer, you are expected to write an analytical overview of the significant literature published on your topic. Your objective is instructional if your readers knows less than you do on the research topic; your purpose is to demonstrative—familiarity, expertise, and intelligence with the topic if the audience are more knowledgeable than you. You can hire or take support from external PHD dissertation writers.
At the outset, you must ensure you meet the following expectations of your readers:
- First, juxtapose your original work in the context of current literature;
- second, analyze and explain the major issues surrounding your topic;
- third, Portray the interconnectivity among each of the research publications;
- fourth, ascertain novel ways to interpret;
- fifth, clarify and address any gaps in previous research;
- sixth, clear the air on contradictory erstwhile studies;
- seventh, sort out literature that has a major contribution to your research; and finally,
- sixth, draw the roadmap for further research (in the future) on your topic.
The substance of the literature review
Structure your engineering lit review well; ensure logical flow of ideas from point to the subsequent points. Ensure sources and references are current and relevant, cited appropriately according to your discipline.
Present terminology and viewpoints on the topic in an unbiased and comprehensive manner.
- Provide an overview of the subject, issue, or theory under discussion;
- split outside works into categories and concepts (in favor or contrary to a particular standpoint).
- link the works to what has come prior to your work and ideas;
- give conclusions about those works; and,
- mention those that provide significant contribution.
To include or not to include each work, you must consider the following
- Value: Do the author’s conclusions add value?
- Convincing: Which of the author’s theses are credibility and why?
- Unbiased: Is the author’s point-of-view neutral?
- Credentials: What are the authors’ qualifications to make the judgments?
Transition between points to analyze, synthesize, and assess external opinions instead of simply summarizing them. And use reporting verbs to communicate clearly; see the following examples:
- To attack, condemn, object, and refute, use critical assessment;
- To allude to, believe, hypothesize, suggest, use tentative evaluation;
- To advocate, argue, hold, and see, use positive evaluation; or
- To address, cite, comment, look at, use neutral evaluation.
Citations in Ph.D. literature review
The way you present the evidence or material in the literature review needs to show that you are 1) selecting and mentioning only the most relevant material; 2) explaining the quotation in light of your argument; 3) introducing and integrating only relevant quotations; and, 3) focusing on the language of quotations in the interpretations.
Use citations to locate your research in a larger narrative. The meticulous use of citations reveals your decisions to give greater emphasis to either the reported author/message. Integral citations (non-parenthetical citations) are those where the name of the cited author occurs in the citing sentence. Non-integral citations make reference to the author within parenthesis or through end or footnotes.
Your ideas are the focal point of your writing; however, align your work with previous research to illustrate its relevance and gravity to the topic.
In conclusion, here is the best way to write a sort version of an engineering Ph.D. literature review that links to opinions in your discipline of study:
- summarize key research by stating arguments and main points;
- analyze by examining the elements or structure of the research;
- synthesize or combine ideas to form an integrated theory via critical evaluation, comparing and contrasting; and finally,
- evaluate and apply to topic based on the criteria you choose;
We can help you in your Ph.D. journey. Talk to us!