Difficulties In Writing Literature Review For A Reasearcher

In Brief

• Literature review is the process of reviewing a huge amount of concepts which are closely related to our research work.
• It is one of the difficult processes for selecting related work that is matched with our work.
• We should be aware of most common difficulties that arise during the writing process of a literature review.

Introduction

The theoretical field as a major and an essential component is also undergoing systematic changes, development and improvement with investigates, writings, and publications in professional, academic and scientific ways. The literature reviews are containing the strong foundation of investigation, examination studies and policies making. Definitely, the purpose of each research is to expose the truth, so the history of the literature review is not novel in the research. It was established and linked around the 17th Century. Review the literature and writing are crucial features of each theoretical research and is ever gaining more ground as in the field of research area. It particularly helps to improve the research standards, and also it helps to identify the novel methods for research scholars.  Many research scholars do not like review/writing academically because of numerous factors like:

• Inaction feeling when initiate the work
• Choked-up or fixed at some point while writing
• Inferiority, nervousness and shyness

Purpose of literature review

There are numerous purposes for writing a literature review. Its help to identify the problems which are stated in the existing research work. In addition to the common purposes, most of the literature reviews having some issues, and they are seeking to identify the questions to be answered.  According to Foss (2017): the review of literature is structured to familiarize the readers to find the keys from various studies. It helps to identify the topic which is related to the field and also determined the gap of the research and problem identification.

Table: Difference between book, annotated bibliography and literature review

Researchers may be confused in the following scenarios

• Where do I start?
• What do I include vs exclude?
• How do I insert myself into the literature review?
• Do I have anything to contribute?
• How do I organize large bodies of literature?
• How do I negotiate power relations and complexities?
• Who do I engage with vs ignore?

If the researcher is confused in literature work, the literature writing service will help in the perfect time.

Challenges for writing literature review

• Bad writing Habits
• Sometimes the search does not shows the perfect results
• Sorting information
• Identifying the research gap
• Identifying the problem that is present in existing research work
• Collecting relevant research paper
• Format the referencing

Table: Top Three bad habits for writing literature review

If you face difficulties to write the literature review, the phdassistance will help you to offer the perfect review on the research thesis as well as journal paper.

Conclusion

Writing and reviewing the Literature is the key for doing the ends of each academic and even other guidelines problem and others. In a short review of literature, no questions or objectives in terms of research and policies making can be effectively done or answered. It has also been the key to all academic research works, publications, thesis, dissertation and others. Even Though, to write a literature review on anything, like academic, law, policy or other accomplishments of life have continued a Phenomenal task for the fact that unlike other writing for other purposes, literature review requires systematic and systematised idea, procedure, organisation and carrying into practice to rational and impartial conclusion.  The perfect literature review saves time, energy and resources for policies makers, academics, writers, readers, and the problems are clearly well-known, and the concepts are properly targeted. However, for literature to be professionally and systematically reviewed, backgrounds and standards have to be discovered and understood and strictly adhered to, including a critique.

References

1. Foss, Sonja K. Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press, 2017.
2. Morrison-Smith, Sarah, and Jaime Ruiz. “Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review.” SN Applied Sciences 2 (2020): 1-33.
3. Ahmad, Sohail. “A Systematic Literature Review on Requirement Change Management Challenges Faced By Developers.”
4. Antony, Jiju, Elisabeth Viles, Alexandre Fonseca Torres, Taynara Incerti de Paula, Marcelo Machado Fernandes, and Elizabeth A. Cudney. “Design of experiments in the service industry: a critical literature review and future research directions.” The TQM Journal (2020).
5. Holland, Tara, and Rawayda Abdou. “Academic writing challenges.