What are the different Standards for doctoral literature reviews (Boote and Beile, 2005)

Literature Review

What are the different Standards for doctoral literature reviews (Boote and Beile, 2005)

Category                      Criterion

Coverage:   Justifies inclusion and exclusion of literature from the review

    Synthesis:

  1. Distinguishes what has been done in the field from what needs to be done
  2.   Places the topic or problem in the broader scholarly literature
  3. Places the research in the historical context of the field
  4. Has a command of key terms and notions, discusses and resolves ambiguities in definitions
  5. Articulates important variables and phenomena relevant to the topic
  6. Synthesizes and gains a new perspective on the literature
    Methodology:

  1. identifies main methodologies and research techniques that have been used in the field, their advantages and disadvantages
  2. Relates ideas and theories in the field to research methodologies
    Significance

  1. Rationalizes the practical significance of the research problem
  2. Rationalizes the scholarly significance of the research problem
    1. Rhetoric :       Writing has a coherent, clear structure that supports the review